Technology Acceptance Model Chatgpt – Use or not? Understanding of acceptance by Chatgpt PhD students in writing through technology acceptance
While the artificial intellectual chat shows a great potential for writing, you know that less doctorate students will accept the use of Chatgpt in writing. Linked to the form of accepted education technology. This study has studied the acceptance of PhD students with Chatgpt in writing and factors that influence it. Investigation in the questionnaire revealed the high determination to use Chatgpt as a written between a PhD student in China. The results show that the attitude is an important prediction factor of behavioral intentions that will use Ghatgpt in writing and as a medium. The impact of the perception of utilities and convenience in use. The convenience of the Chatgpt applications are influenced by the experience of using Chatgpt of this academic student, showing effective evidence about the enforcement of the style of technology to accept the acceptance of Chatgpt in writing. Results are significant in the use of Chatgpt for writing in higher education.
Technology Acceptance Model Chatgpt
Artificial Intelligence Technology (AI) plays an important role in the more digital world (Lee et al., 2022; Farrookhnia et al., 2023). For chattgpt, Chatgpt is a large linguistic format that can be learned freely from data and creating messages similar to human (Van Dis ET A., 2023). It can be discussed in a variety of topics and creates a similar response after a human training (Openi, 2023) since launching in November 2022 Chatgpt has stimulated a discussion about the effects of education (Farokhnia et al., 2023; Tlili et al. Educational guidelines can be changed by providing basic knowledge about various topics (Tlili et al., 2023) and facilitating personal and complex learning (Farrookhnia et al., 2023). The incorrect texts can encourage scam and threatening academic integrity. The dispute makes Ghatgpt “the highest and the most debate of AI to study until now.” (Williamson et al., 2023, P. 2)
Apple And Technology Adoption Model
Writing is one of the most influential domains in the Chatgpt (Toecharungroj, 2023; Yan, 2023) while writing is an important role in higher education. (Kirkpatrick, 2019) is often considered to call for language students, especially for those who learn and use English as an additional language (but 2021). The previous research indicates that CHATBOTS is effective in this challenge because they can give important advice and suggestions to support their language students to be less concerned and improve the quality of the writing. (Guo et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2023) as a Chatbot, which has been stimulated by the Chatgpt’s Secret Ceremony, showing better skills compared to the previous Chatbots (for example, Eliza) to understand the natural language, creating answers and is involved in the transaction, so the new writing methods are opened. 2023; su et al., 2023) as summarized by Imran and Almusharraf (2023), Chatgpt are “complete packages from the final editing and modification of writing materials” (P.2). But it is important to face a PhD student (Kirkpatrick, 2019) No one knows that and a PhD student intends to use Chatgpt as a written and main factor. Was informed by the form of technology acceptance (Davis, 1989). This study tried to fill the gap by confronting the following two questions: (1) How to accept the PhD students in Ghatgpt in writing? (2) What factors are influenced by the intention to accept a doctorate degree GingPT in writing? This information is important because the intention of the person to use and use AI technology is a necessity to improve teaching and writing (Cheng, 2019; Yan, 2023).
Chat, computer programs or artificial intelligence systems designed to simulate human conversations and interact with users through natural languages, have received a lot of attention and use it in a more written in the past ten years (Zhang ET A., 2023) Chatbots. Demonstrated excellent potential as writing and learning partners in writing in the classroom, as they can provide a variety of languages and response about students’ writing processes and make students feel less stressful from their writing efficiency in the learning process (GUO ET A. 2022). As a new chat bot, buried in the architecture of the transformer before training and exceeding the first chat in terms of understanding and manufacturing messages similar to humans, as well as giving suggestions about long texts (Dwivedi et, 2023; (Barrot, DERGAA ET A., 2023; ALMUSHARAF, 2023).
Considering closely links between Chatgpt and the increasing data warehouse of the research has been conducted to study the benefits and threats related to the use of Chatgpt in writing. By bringing Chatgpt writers for academic writing experience of Bishop (2023), it shows that Chatgpt is effective in explaining the concepts that are well -known between languages for appropriate and personal, adjusting the style and voice of different texts to mimic different writers. Zoom in the use of Chatgpt in the context of the second language writing, Barrot (2023) and on ET AL (2023) has the potential to cooperate with more chatgpt to write a classroom. For them, ChatgPT has considered writing a variety of writing such as compliance and grammar and able to support structural structure, conversation and linguistics of quality writing by helping students to create a topic of content, editing content. By presenting research on searches in Chatgpt in the DERGAA academic world and the group (2023) and Imran and Almusharraf (2023), emphasizing the necessity of use of the Chatgpt as a valuable tool for writing the assistant to support the writing process and improve academic writing.
Despite being useful But the use of Chatgpt in writing also causes anxiety about incorrect response and unintelligent, honesty, loss, learning and inequality (Dwivedi et al., 2023; FARKHNIA et al., 2023; Tlili et al., 2023) as specified by the developers. Sometimes write a reliable answer. But incorrect or has no meaning. “The information that is incorrect and distorted can cause students to misunderstand and include their writing, so it destroys the knowledge and progress of science (Tlili et al. 2023; Van Dis ET al., 2023). In writing, it is related to non -intersections, which are outstanding by using unrelated announcements, the strength of the writing model and insufficiency in the deep emotional writing (Barrot, 2023). Dis et al., 2023; Williamson et al., 2023; Yan, 2023) In addition, CHATGPT’s origin allows students to finish writing through copies and laying, so it means loss of learning, especially when students are trusted by Chatbot, using artificial intelligence. The written Chatgpt may lead to inequality (Dwivedi et al., 2023). Focusing on the work of the text of Chatgpt, for example, searching for Yan (2023) shows that university students are very interested in the impact on the educational artifacts, because the teacher may not separate the productivity by ChattGT.
Students’ Acceptance Of Chatgpt In Higher Education: An Extended Unified Theory Of Acceptance And Use Of Technology
While the case of the above users and academic discussions are useful for revealing the potential and errors of using Chatgpt in writing. Searching in Chatgpt is still in the beginning (Barrot, 2023). There are only a few empirical research to check the social use of Chatgpt as a written chain. Because writing is essential for PhD study (such as Kirkpatrick, 2019) and depending on the progress of AI (YAN, 2023) technology, it is necessary to explore and check the intention of PhD students with discussion and influenza factors. This information may understand the acceptance of a PhD student Chatgpt in writing and creating useful in -depth information for use from Chatgpt and other artificial intelligence technology that is similar to teaching and learning in tertiary.
Accepting users refers to the preparation of users with the potential to use technology (Lee and Lehto, 2013). TAM that emerged from reasonable actions has become a social and influential technique that tries to identify and explain the acceptance of technology by the destination (such as Cheng, 2019; Granić and Marangunić, 2019) In TAM, the acceptance of people with specific technology, proceeding with their behavioral determination (Lee and Lehto, 2013). On the other hand, it is determined by the attitude of the people and by the Davis et al., 1989), the attitude towards the technology, emphasizing the emotional reaction of a person and the evaluation of technology (AJZEN, 1991; Lee and Lehto, 2013) and has a close relationship with the internal motivation (Davis ET.